AND THE OSCAR GOES TO ...

Oscar ramp-up blathering on the background, which inspired me to share the contents of a couple of emails I received this morning from a former Duncroft woman who takes exception to my opinion that she has a lot to answer for when it comes to the original complaints against Jimmy Savile. 

First, this person needs to understand I can say what I wish as long as it's not untrue.  She's welcome to have her brief contact me if she wishes, but none of it's enforceable; I am not located in the UK. I've combined both emails, and add my own comments in parens. 

Are you sitting comfortably?  Then we'll begin. 

Under the subject line "Please stop now." 

" You have taken the bate (sic). As she wanted you to. (Er - what?  She?  She who?)

I have not got a Twitter account. I am not any character on Twitter.  (Yes, you are.  You're a couple of characters at least. That's always been your m.o.  Pretending to be a whole lot of people. I've already discussed this in my post about Miss McGoo.)

Alastair Scott Johnston never legally adopted me.  (Did he illegally adopt you?  How did that all come about?  Why are you using his name?)

We all know the comments you allowed from Ellen Coulson are wrong. (Dead giveaway with the familiar phrase "we all know."  Who is "we all" exactly?  I keep hearing about these entities but it's never explained.)

1. I never contacted Savile or posted in 1979 that I did..please provide evidence. (You posted that on Friends Reunited.  Here's the photo you shared.  1979, at Duncroft.)

2. It is Fran, as you well know on his car. (I'll give you that, and I don't think it was Savile's car either.) (Photo of Fran and Savile below.)

Because I blocked you I could not have taken any pictures of you. (Well, if you had no Twitter account how could you block me?  Try and think things through before you hit 'send.')

You have publicly blamed me for others actions.  I have never had a web page, stolen or stalked you or even posted about anything on any site like Amazon.  (Don't give yourself airs, I never thought you were the poster on Amazon.  Not your writing style at all. That poster, btw, stated that she thought Karin Ward's sad little memoir was a work of fiction. You are stalking me now; however,  if itamuses you, go ahead.  It's a long swim from Weymouth to Los Angeles, so the sharks would get you long before you landed on the west coast. They apparently already have!

Who said you had a web page?  Someone was running the Duncroft FB page, selling t-shirts and mugs and so on, but though I believe you participated, I've been otherwise informed the moderator was someone who lives in the Antipodes. )

Yes you have pissed someone off. She was a professional poker player.  (Oh PLEASE!  A what??)

Try looking at Angela Mitchell/Lancaster/Lettscallit-Smith. (No, you try looking at it.  Let me know when you find something.)

I think you will find that she and her boyfriend have been responsible for all you blamed me for. (I think I will find that you are responsible. As usual. Stop blaming others.  Vague claims about poker players just don't wash.  Much more information needed about that, and I have no interest in doing any research about this fictional character.)

Just for your information The Navy Lark did not end in 1976. (Yes, it did.)

How could a man, of his age be my father? (You're in your late 50s aren't you?  Of course you could have a father in his late 30s when he adopted you.  Don't be silly.)

Yes I am a Lady Freeman..I don't mind you checking. (Did you mean Lady Freemason?  You have to be of good character to be a Mason, and a spell in an approved school would eliminate you right there.  There's certainly no Lady Freeman according to Debrett's.  How did that come about?)

A skin disease...yeh? Well you do not know my medical history do you? (Just reporting what you already claimed elsewhere.  You said you were in a wheelchair.  I looked up the disease you allegedly had and that's what it is.  Sorry. )

Btw I have reported all this to the police. No I have not lied. (No, you probably haven't because this is a civil matter, and yes, you have lied.  Repeatedly.)

They have been very informative, as have the legal profession. (I await a communication from your brief then.  They run pretty expensive these days. Waste of your ill-gotten gains, I'd say.)

You think you know my syntax, well, like you do, it can be changed. (Well, "we all know" about your syntax.)

Forgot to add. I have never forged a letter.  Spoken to police about that too. (Someone forged a letter, and you reportedly have a lot of forged documents on the walls of your home.  Let alone the silly photoshopping you've been engaging in with my photos.)

Also kindly note your information is wrong, many, including Carol lied to you.  She thanks you btw for telling everyone what a good pupil she was. (I bet Carol appreciates being called a liar. And under the bus she goes, folks!)

Yes we do all have our records from Duncroft and the social services. (And?)

The only reason Carol posted that no one made any money was because we believe there is a possibility that Toni Txxxxxx sold her story to the Sun newspaper. (I believe Debbie C also sold a story.  And I don't think Carol posted anything to that effect.)

You really have fallen for this one and we do know what info she and her boyfriend have on you. (Oh stop it! Nobody has anything 'on' me.  If I had anything to hide, you think I'd be using my real name?)

The following was passed on to me by an official who states that it does not matter where you live, if your posts are visible in any country you come under that countries laws. (Tsk, it's "country's" laws. And in this country, we have something called freedom of speech.)

You are not only responsible for the veracity of your own posts but those of your commentators.  (Others are entitled to their opinions.  And unless there is some sound legal reason, i.e. pending litigation, to remove anything anyone has said, it stands.)"

 

I wanted to add that this woman represents herself as being a 'doctor' of some sort.  Is there any end to the fantasies? 

 

And the Oscar for bullshit artist of the year goes to ...

 

 

 

Comments

[Sally Stevens]

Karma bites - you should also have a look at this excellent blog http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.com/

and this one, maintained by another former Duncroft pupil

http://annaraccoon.com/category/duncroftsavile/

[Karma bites]

Oh the great Fiona. She needs to remember how old she was when she attended Duncroft and when the last series of Clunk Click was recorded. You will probably find that she wasn't a pupil when she claimed she was abused in HIS dressing room after a recording of the show. So much evidence to disprove so much of what she has said. MWT should have verified her D.O.B. I am sure if he had done his homework he might have realised that she couldn't have been there as she stated. Like to see her swear on oath to various claims and statements she has made. Too late now to put that to the test. Wish I had found this blog ages ago.

[Moor Larkin]

1979? Exposure quite clearly places it as a photo from 1974.

"Even if they are different people Fiona's story seems unbelievable anyway, just as she herself feared it would be. Nobody believed her in the past because originally she never told anyone, and now it seems more than possible that everyone she has told the story to since, has been told a different story. One thing about lies is that they are very hard to keep consistent, whereas the truth is, perhaps quite tediously, always the same."
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/exposition-pt10.html

[Ellen Coulson]

You forget Bebe - didn't she sell story! Yes got photo wrong but why was Dr Fiona M Scott-Johnston Jones cavorting with JS in a bikini anyway?

If he had not adopted her don't think Social Services would have allowed him to take her home from Duncroft and there is that infamous bio she sent out. At some point she was saying she had inherited his title!

How many e-mail addresses have we got for her - I can find 3 immediately!