Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ellen Coulson

Hopefully all liars will be prosecuted even if they have not claimed against the Estate. Some lies are so easy to prove!

Moor Larkin

* Consider the source, all ye bold enforcers of the law. Does a leopard really change its spots? *

There is good reason to believe that most of the litigants in the "historical abuse" cases are ex-cons of one sort or another. You will also often find they have a background of drug or alcohol abuse. Their backgrounds feed into the myth of course, because their abuse made them behave that way.

The main reason for suspicion on the issue is not that ex-cons are always liars, but rather that lawyers have actively recruited for Allegators in prisons and in their adverts "promise" that 90% of claims will never have to go to court. In other words, "make allegations and you will not even be tested"

David Rose has a background in this area of malpractice and I suspect that is a big driver for him personally. This magazine pdf is engrossing about the bigger picture


Rabbit Away

Nice one Sally ! Thank goodness for the ex-Duncroft gals. The ones who know the truth and aren't afraid to tell it that is !

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)