« HELL HATH NO FURY - PART FOUR | Main | ALL IN THE FAMILY »

03/02/2014

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Moor Larkin

1979? Exposure quite clearly places it as a photo from 1974.

"Even if they are different people Fiona's story seems unbelievable anyway, just as she herself feared it would be. Nobody believed her in the past because originally she never told anyone, and now it seems more than possible that everyone she has told the story to since, has been told a different story. One thing about lies is that they are very hard to keep consistent, whereas the truth is, perhaps quite tediously, always the same."
http://jimcannotfixthis.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/exposition-pt10.html

Ellen Coulson

You forget Bebe - didn't she sell story! Yes got photo wrong but why was Dr Fiona M Scott-Johnston Jones cavorting with JS in a bikini anyway?

If he had not adopted her don't think Social Services would have allowed him to take her home from Duncroft and there is that infamous bio she sent out. At some point she was saying she had inherited his title!

How many e-mail addresses have we got for her - I can find 3 immediately!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.